- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/F1_score
- http://scikit-learn.org/stable/modules/generated/sklearn.metrics.f1_score.html
F1 Score and Accuracy scores are both used in classification tasks. Accuracy score has some shortfalls. For example, if the dataset is obviously biased. For example, if most of the input data is negative (of the negative class only), say 99.99%. Then the machine does not need to explicitly learn anything intelligent. It can just guess "negative"every time, it will still be 99.99% accurate. F1 score is a shorthand to measure a composite score of the confusion matrix - true positive, true negative, false positive, false negative.
F1 score is a combination of recall and precision. It also a shorthand to measure how accurate and useful the result is.
Accuracy is a simple fraction of correctly classified objects over total number of objects.
It can be misleading to only focus on accuracy, especially when data labels are imbalanced, even if data is representative. Certain scenarios are simply more prevalent in the population data. For example, by definition orphan diseases are the minority data points in the real world.
F1 score is a combination of recall and precision. It also a shorthand to measure how accurate and useful the result is.
Accuracy is a simple fraction of correctly classified objects over total number of objects.
It can be misleading to only focus on accuracy, especially when data labels are imbalanced, even if data is representative. Certain scenarios are simply more prevalent in the population data. For example, by definition orphan diseases are the minority data points in the real world.
The article is very good. Really your post is really very good and I appreciate it. It’s hard to sort the good from the bad sometimes, but I think you’ve nailed it. You write very well which is amazing. I really impressed by your post. Downloadfreepdf//220-1001//AWS-Certified-Solutions-Architect-Professional
ReplyDelete